Back to Research
Regulatory & PolicySeptember 20267 min read

A 205-Bed New York Assisted Living Building Sold For $71,200 A Unit. The 31 Percent Medicaid Rate Is Why.

This week a 1974 assisted living community outside Rochester traded for $10.25 million while losing more than $1.3 million of EBITDAR on $5.56 million of revenue. Most of its beds sit in New York's Assisted Living Program, a Medicaid benefit designed to pay half of a nursing home rate that, according to a bill now in the State Senate, pays about 31 percent. The trade is a clean case study in what a formula rate does to a building's value, and why the per-unit price is not a comp.

Hilton East Assisted Living, Hilton, NY: 144 units / 205 beds, built 1974, sold for $10.25 million, reported as $71,200 per unit (The SeniorCare Investor, September 25, 2026)
The Trade
81% occupancy at marketing; losing more than $1.3 million of EBITDAR on $5.56 million of revenue, a negative margin above 23% (The SeniorCare Investor, September 25, 2026; margin computed)
The Operating Picture
ALP Medicaid rates are 'based on fifty percent of the 1992 regional nursing home average rate for the sixteen ALP regions', adjusted for minimum wage (NYS DOH Dear Administrator Letter, July 30, 2020)
The Rate Formula
Senate Bill S9392 sponsor memo: ALPs 'now receive only 31%' of the nursing home rate against the intended 50%, and at least 19 downstate ALPs closed in the past five years (NY Senate, introduced March 9, 2026)
The Gap

A Sale That Only Makes Sense Once You Read The Rate Formula

On September 25, The SeniorCare Investor reported that Senior Living Investment Brokerage had sold Hilton East Assisted Living, an assisted living community in Hilton, New York, outside Rochester. The building dates from 1974. It has 205 licensed beds in 144 units, and up to 119 of those beds are designated for New York's Assisted Living Program (The SeniorCare Investor, "SLIB Handles ALP Deal in New York," September 25, 2026).

The operating figures in that report are unusually candid. Occupancy was 81% at the time of marketing. The community was losing more than $1.3 million of EBITDAR on $5.56 million of revenue. The seller had multiple offers and chose a private real estate development company, which paid $10.25 million, reported as $71,200 per unit (The SeniorCare Investor, September 25, 2026).

On our arithmetic that is $71,181 per unit, almost exactly $50,000 per licensed bed, and about 1.84 times revenue. The EBITDAR loss is a negative margin of more than 23%. There is no cap rate, because there is no income to capitalise.

A reader scanning the Deal Wire could file $71,200 per unit as a very cheap assisted living comp. It isn't one. To see why, you need to know how the beds in this building are paid.

What The Assisted Living Program Actually Is

New York's Assisted Living Program, or ALP, is a Medicaid benefit delivered inside licensed adult homes and enriched housing. The Department of Health describes it as serving people who are "medically eligible for nursing home placement" in "a less medically intensive, lower cost setting," covering personal care, room, board, housekeeping, supervision and home health aide services (New York State Department of Health, "Assisted Living Program (ALP)," consumer guide page, accessed September 2026).

The eligibility test matters for underwriting. Residents must be medically eligible for a nursing home. So an ALP bed is not a light-care assisted living bed that happens to be paid by Medicaid. It is a nursing-home-eligible resident, cared for under a residential licence, at a residential price.

The Formula, And How Far It Has Drifted

ALP beds are not priced by the market. The state sets the rate. In its Dear Administrator Letter of July 30, 2020, the Department of Health said that "the ALP Rates are based on fifty percent of the 1992 regional nursing home average rate for the sixteen ALP regions." The rates were adjusted for minimum wage increases using survey data that ALPs submitted, under Title 10, Part 86-7 of the state's rules (NYS DOH, ALP Dear Administrator Letter, July 30, 2020). The Department's current rate page lists minimum wage updates through a Dear Administrator Letter dated March 9, 2026 (NYS DOH, "Assisted Living Program (ALP) Rates," revised March 2026).

There are two anchors in that sentence. One is fifty percent. The other is 1992. A benchmark fixed to a 34-year-old regional average, and moved since only by minimum wage passthroughs, does not track the actual cost of caring for a nursing-home-eligible resident in 2026.

The legislature now has a number for the drift. Senate Bill S9392, introduced on March 9, 2026 by Senator Jessica Ramos and currently in the Senate Health Committee, would create an ALP reimbursement pilot. Its sponsor memo says the 1992 legislation meant ALPs to receive 50% of nursing home reimbursement, but that ALPs "now receive only 31%, due to the absence of a statutory mechanism." The memo also says at least 19 downstate ALP facilities have closed in the past five years, and that 13 of those were voluntary closures driven by financial unsustainability (NY Senate, S9392 sponsor memo, 2025-2026 session).

On those figures, providers are being paid about 62% of the rate the programme was designed to deliver. The bill would phase the rate from 31% to 35% in its first year and reach 50% by the fifth year. The sponsor memo lists the fiscal impact as "to be determined."

Two points for anyone treating the bill as upside. First, it is a pilot, not a statewide rate reset. Participants must employ at least fifty people, keep average annual occupancy of at least 80%, and meet a workforce demographic test (S9392, bill text). Second, it is sitting in committee. Until it passes, a buyer should model the rate New York pays today, not the rate a bill proposes.

Reading Hilton East Through The Formula

The trade report did not break revenue down by payer, so we cannot say how many of the up-to-119 ALP beds were filled with Medicaid residents. The arithmetic below is illustrative only.

If the 81% occupancy applied to beds, about 166 of 205 beds were filled. $5.56 million of revenue spread across 166 occupied beds is roughly $33,500 per occupied bed per year, or about $2,790 a month (computed). CareScout's 2025 Cost of Care Survey puts the national assisted living median at $6,200 a month (CareScout, 2025). On that rough basis, this building was bringing in less than half the national median per occupied bed, while serving a population that is, by definition, nursing-home-eligible.

That is how a 205-bed building can lose more than $1.3 million before rent. The limit on revenue is structural: the state sets it, and the formula has not kept pace with costs. Better marketing does not fix that.

It also explains who bought it. The buyer was a real estate development company, not a seniors housing operator or a healthcare REIT. The report did not disclose the buyer's plans. But a price of about 1.84 times revenue on a money-losing 1974 building is a price for land, structure and optionality, not for a care business.

What The Illinois Comparison Shows

We covered a similar structure earlier this month. Illinois's Supportive Living Program per diem is set at 54.75% of the average nursing facility services per diem in the provider's rate-setting region (Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services programme description, as cited in our September 2026 Illinois coverage). Both states pay Medicaid assisted living as a percentage of a nursing home rate. The difference is that Illinois's percentage is attached to a current regional rate, while New York's is attached to 1992.

That difference in formula design goes straight into what a buyer can pay. A formula tied to a current benchmark moves when the benchmark moves. A formula frozen to a historical base erodes every year until a legislature acts.

How To Underwrite A Formula-Rate Bed

Model the rate that is actually paid, from the actual rate sheet. Pull the building's ALP region and current rate from the Department of Health rate page. Never start from the "fifty percent" in the statute.

Split the census by payer before you price it. A building with 119 ALP-designated beds and 86 other beds is two businesses under one roof. Private-pay assisted living economics apply only to the private-pay beds.

Treat pending legislation as an option, not a base case. S9392 would lift the rate materially if it passed, but only for pilot participants who meet its tests. Price it as upside with a probability attached, never as in-place income.

Check the occupancy threshold against the building. The pilot requires average annual occupancy of at least 80%. Hilton East was at 81% at marketing. A building sitting that close to a programme's eligibility floor carries risk on both sides of the line.

The Bottom Line

Hilton East traded for $71,200 a unit not because upstate New York assisted living is cheap, but because most of its beds are paid on a Medicaid formula that, on the Senate sponsor's own account, delivers about 31% of a nursing home rate against a design intent of 50%. When a per-unit price looks too low to be real, the first question is who sets the rent. When the answer is the state, the rate formula is the valuation, and the comp set is other buildings paid under the same formula, not the private-pay community down the road.

Disclaimer: This report is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Data sourced from Bureau of Reclamation, NIC MAP, American Lung Association, and other public institutional sources. Crawford Commercial Group Real Estate Group. April 2026.

Ready to Act on This Research?

Crawford Commercial Group is a boutique senior-living-focused advisory group. Let our team put this market intelligence to work for your portfolio.